Walkthrough transcript · GitHub Copilot app | local Interactive session

Review the change. Challenge it. Manage context.

Illustrative walkthrough: Review the change. Challenge it. Manage context. The app has its own built-ins; /tests and /fix are not promised app commands.
Illustrative GIF · Before · After · Transcript

Illustrative reenactment - not a recorded Copilot session. Test results are real fixture runs.

Client: GitHub Copilot app | local Interactive session. Track: builtins.

Commands: /review, /rubber-duck, /context, /compact.

The dialogue and artifact snapshots below are authored examples. Test summaries are verbatim excerpts from real fixture runs; stack traces and machine-local paths are omitted.

Step 1: Use the app's actual command picker

Participant:

Add work/builtins as a local repository. Use /plan; approve it, then return to Interactive mode for red tests and the repair. Make a change in the active session before /review.

Illustrative checkpoint:

The lab baseline commit makes the repair reviewable. App commands are context-dependent; inspect the live / picker instead of assuming the VS Code command list.

Source or artifact snapshot:

Copilot app built-ins

/plan
/review
/rubber-duck
/context
/compact

No homemade command is needed.

Observed test summary:

ok 1 - existing cart behavior is preserved
not ok 2 - quantities are applied
not ok 3 - invalid cart lines are rejected
not ok 4 - safe integer cents are enforced
ok 5 - inputs are left untouched
ok 6 - public API and scope are preserved
not ok 7 - learner regressions catch the original bug
# tests 7
# suites 0
# pass 3
# fail 4
# cancelled 0
# skipped 0
# todo 0

Step 2: Invoke /review on actual session changes

Participant:

/review

Illustrative checkpoint:

Inspect the quantity fix, input rejection, overflow boundaries, preserved API and untracked tests. Cite actionable findings; do not trust a success summary alone.

Source or artifact snapshot:

Review targets

src/cart.mjs
src/cart.test.mjs
BRIEF.md contract

Require source locations and impact.
Do not edit during review.

Observed test summary:

ok 1 - existing cart behavior is preserved
ok 2 - quantities are applied
ok 3 - invalid cart lines are rejected
ok 4 - safe integer cents are enforced
ok 5 - inputs are left untouched
ok 6 - public API and scope are preserved
ok 7 - learner regressions catch the original bug
# tests 7
# suites 0
# pass 7
# fail 0
# cancelled 0
# skipped 0
# todo 0

Step 3: Invoke /rubber-duck to challenge assumptions

Participant:

/rubber-duck Challenge the cart repair against BRIEF.md. Look for missed boundaries, tests that also pass on the original implementation, and out-of-scope changes. Do not edit.

Illustrative checkpoint:

Challenge zero quantity, fractional cents, unsafe sums, and whether the new tests fail on the original code. Critique is not a passing test run.

Source or artifact snapshot:

Boundary questions

Does qty = 0 throw?
Are unsafe products rejected?
Can a happy-path-only suite pass?
Did legacy pricing stay untouched?

Observed test summary:

ok 1 - existing cart behavior is preserved
ok 2 - quantities are applied
ok 3 - invalid cart lines are rejected
ok 4 - safe integer cents are enforced
ok 5 - inputs are left untouched
ok 6 - public API and scope are preserved
ok 7 - learner regressions catch the original bug
# tests 7
# suites 0
# pass 7
# fail 0
# cancelled 0
# skipped 0
# todo 0

Step 4: /context, then /compact after saving evidence

Participant:

/context

Save the brief, decisions and actual test output.
Then invoke /compact and reattach BRIEF.md.

Illustrative checkpoint:

Context inspection and compaction help keep a long session focused. They do not preserve every detail or prove correctness. Restate scope and unresolved work afterward.

Source or artifact snapshot:

Before compaction

Save: decisions and evidence
After: reattach BRIEF.md
Confirm: scope and open issues

Keep approvals on.

Observed test summary:

ok 1 - existing cart behavior is preserved
ok 2 - quantities are applied
ok 3 - invalid cart lines are rejected
ok 4 - safe integer cents are enforced
ok 5 - inputs are left untouched
ok 6 - public API and scope are preserved
ok 7 - learner regressions catch the original bug
# tests 7
# suites 0
# pass 7
# fail 0
# cancelled 0
# skipped 0
# todo 0

Takeaway: The app has its own built-ins; /tests and /fix are not promised app commands.

Try it yourself: Lab 1: /commands + Spec Kit. Set up first with the lab environment guide.